In 2015 the genome of Oase-1 was published, a Homo sapiens individual from Romania who lived 38-42 thousand years ago (ka). The study of the genetic material preserved in the mandible showed that this individual had a Neandertal ancestor as recently as four to six generations back. That was shocking…
Now we also have the genome from a long bone of a female human (Denisova 11, aka ‘Denny’) found at the Denisova Cave in Siberia, who was at least 13 years old at death according to its cortical thickness. Direct dating of the fossil showed it to be beyond the radiocarbon limit, hence it is older than 50,000 years, probably around 90-100 ka. Oase-1 now pales in comparison to the findings from Denny…
- Denny’s DNA fragments carried alleles matching in similar proportions the Denisovan genome and the Neandertal genome. She was the daughter of a Neandertal mother and a Denisovan father.
- The Denisovan father had more than one Neandertal ancestor in his genealogy, as recently as 300 to 600 generations back.
- The Neandertals that contributed to the ancestry of the father were from a different population than her mother. The Neandertal mother came from a population more closely related to the Neandertals who live later in Western Europe (compared to the Vindija material from Croatia) than to the earlier Neandertals from the Denisova Cave.
- Eastern Neandertals migrated into Western Europe after 90 ka, and/or Western Neandertals migrated to the Altai region before 90 ka and partially replaced the local population.
(L) Denisova 11, credit Nature vol 560 23 Aug 18. (R) Oase 1, credit Roberto Sáez
La cueva Denisova, localizada en las montañas Altai de Siberia, se ha hecho indudablemente famosa en el estudio de la evolución humana por una singularidad: allí convivieron tres grupos diferentes de humanos en los últimos 100.000 años: denisovanos, neandertales y humanos modernos.
Todo comienza en 2010, cuando se publican una falange de dedo (Denisova 3) y un molar (Denisova 4) encontrados en la cueva. De estos restos se pudo recuperar material genético y fue analizado por el Max Planck Institute. El resultado fue que estos dos especímenes pertenecen a una especie humana distinta, “prima” de los neandertales, que se conoce como “denisovanos” en espera de una definición científica.
Se estima que Denisova 3 era una hembra joven y Denisova 4 un macho adulto. En 2010 se halló otro molar, inicialmente considerado de un oso de las cavernas debido a su tamaño y la robustez y morfología de las raíces… Sin embargo esta idea se reconsideró posteriormente y se planteó como un diente humano, lo cual fue confirmado a través del estudio de su ADN: este fósil resultó ser el tercer denisovano conocido (Denisova 8). Finalmente (por ahora), un segundo molar inferior deciduo perteneciente a una hembra infantil denisovana ha sido publicado en 2017 (Denisova 2).
Conozcamos a los 4 denisovanos, que nos están permitiendo definir una especie humana diferente, por ahora tan solo por su material genético:
Los 4 denisovanos. Crédito foto: Max Planck Institute
The Denisova Cave in Siberia’s Altai Mountains is known for being a unique place, where three different groups of humans lived in the last 100 K years: Denisovans, Neandertals and Modern Humans.
A finger phalanx (Denisova 3) and a molar (Denisova 4) from that site were published in 2010. Fortunately the genetic materials were preserved, allowing the Max Planck Institute to analyse the DNA. They resulted to be a new species, cousin of the Neandertals, named the ‘Denisovans’. Both species share a common ancestor, which in turn shares a common ancestor with Homo sapiens. Moreover, 0.5% of the genome of Denisova 3 was derived from a Neandertal population, probably related to the Neandertals that lived in the Denisova Cave.
Denisovans also interbred with some populations of Homo sapiens, contributing about 5% of the genome of some today’s Oceania people and 0.2% of the genome of Native Americans and main-land Asians.
Denisova 3 was a young girl and Denisova 4 was an adult male. A second molar was found in 2010 – thought to belong to a cave bear given its size and huge, splayed roots. This was later reconsidered to be a human tooth. Its DNA was analysed by the Max Planck Institute and published in 2015. It turned out to be another adult male Denisovan specimen (Denisovan 8), the third one we know so far.
What do we know about the Denisovan DNA?
Denisova 8 molar. Photo: Bence Viola
- Nuclear DNA sequences from the two molars form a clade with the one of the finger phalanx. The three specimens were a single biological group.
- The mitocondrial DNA of Denisova 8 has accumulated fewer substitutions than the other two specimens. This means that he was present in the region aprox. 60 K years before the other two (c. 110 KYA). The Denisovans either occupied the region at least 110 to 50 KYA, or came into the region at least twice.
- The nuclear DNA sequence diversity among the three Denisovans is comparable to that among the Neandertals, but lower than that among today’s humans.
- The new genetic analysis shows less relationship to Neandertals than the analysis from 2010.
- Although the morphology of third molars is generally variable, both molars Denisova 4 and Denisova 8 are very large and lack traits typical of Neandertals and modern humans.
- The length of Denisova 8 is comparable to Pliocene hominins. Only two other Late Pleistocene third molars are comparable in size. The size of the two molars may suggest that large teeth is a Denisovan feature.
- The Denisovan molars also have massively flaring roots and relatively large and complex crowns. They show similarities with the Xujiayao teeth recently described by Xing S., Martinón-Torres M. et al. Large teeth and massive roots are indicative of massive jaws. Could this be the first clue of the Denisovan morphology?
Denisova 4 molar. Photo: Bence Viola
- As resulted from the 2010 DNA analysis, the Denisova 3 phalanx carries a component derived from an unknown hominin who diverged 1–4 MYA from the lineage leading to Neandertals, Denisovans and today’s humans. That hominin could be Homo erectus, or another ancestor we have not found any fossil yet. This new study has no clear output concerning this component, which seems to differ among the three Denisovan individuals.
Denisova 8, Denisova 4, Neandertal Krapina D109, Homo sapiens. Photo: S. Sawyer et al, PNAS
In March 2018 a new technique was applied to 5,639 whole-genome sequences from Eurasia and Oceania. This study concludes:
- There was Denisovan introgression in the specimens from East and South Asia and Papuans.
- At least two distinct instances of Denisovan admixture into modern humans occurred.
- There is a much closer Denisovan match among Han Chinese, Chinese Dai, and Japanese DNA sequences.